术中先处理动脉还是静脉对NSCLC患者循环肿瘤细胞及生存的影响(IF暂无)

2019-05-12 SCI天天读 SCI天天读

SCI10 May 2019Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung CancerWei S, Guo C, He J, et al. Effect of Vein-Fir

SCI

10 May 2019

Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Wei S, Guo C, He J, et al. Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Registry-Based Propensity Score Matching Analysis. JAMA Surg 2019:e190972.

Corresponding Author: Lunxu Liu, MD, PhD, FRCS, Department of Thoracic Surgery,West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu,Sichuan 610041, China(lunxu_liu@aliyun.com).

IMPORTANCE 重要性

It is important to develop a surgical technique to reduce dissemination of tumor cells into the blood during surgery.

发展可以减少肿瘤细胞在术中扩散入血的外科技术很重要。

OBJECTIVE 目的

To compare the outcomes of different sequences of vessel ligation during surgery on the dissemination of tumor cells and survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

比较的术中不同血管离断顺序对NSCLC患者肿瘤细胞扩散及生存状况的影响。

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS 设计,设置及参与者

This multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2016 to March 2018 with patients with non–small cell lung cancer who received thoracoscopic lobectomy in West China Hospital, Daping Hospital, and Sichuan Cancer Hospital. To further compare survival outcomes of the 2 procedures, we reviewed the Western China Lung Cancer database (2005-2017) using the same inclusion criteria.

此为一项多中心随机临床试验,于2016年12月至2018年3月在华西医院、大坪医院、四川肿瘤医院接受胸腔镜肺叶切除术的NSCLC患者中进行。为了进一步比较两种手术的生存结果,我们使用相同的纳入标准对中国西部肺癌数据库(2005-2017)进行了回顾性分析。

INTERVENTIONS  干预

Vein-first procedure vs artery-first procedure.

先离断静脉与先离断动脉对比

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES 主要记过及措施

Changes in folate receptor–positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) after surgery and 5-year overall, disease-free, and lung cancer–specific survival.

术后叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞(FR+CTCs)和5年总体无病生存、肺癌特异性生存率的变化。

RESULTS 结果

A total of 86 individuals were randomized; 22 patients (25.6%) were younger and 46 (74.4%) older than 60 years. Of these, 78 patients were analyzed. After surgery, an incremental change in FR+CTCs was observed in 26 of 40 patients (65.0%) in the artery-first group and 12 of 38 (31.6%) in the vein-first group (P = .003) (median change, 0.73 [interquartile range (IQR), -0.86 to 1.58] FU per 3mL vs -0.50 [IQR, -2.53 to 0.79] FU per 3 mL; P = .006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the artery-first procedure was a risk factor for FR+CTC increase during surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 4.03 [95%CI, 1.53-10.63]; P = .005).

共随机抽取86人;22例(25.6%)年龄小于60岁,46例(74.4%)年龄大于60岁。最后纳入其中78例患者进行分析。动脉先断组的40名患者中有26例(65.0%)出现FR+CTC增多,而静脉先断组的38名患者中有12例(31.6%)增多(中位变化为0.73 [四分位间距(IQR), - 0.86 - 1.58] / 3mL FU 相比 - 0.50 [IQR, - 2.53 - 0.79] / 3mL FU;P = .006)。手术后,增量变化FR + ctc在26日的40例(65.0%)artery-first组和12 38 vein-first组(31.6%)(P = .003)(中位数变化,0.73(四分位范围(差),-0.86到1.58)每3毫升vs-0.50傅傅(IQR-2.53到0.79)/ 3毫升;P = .006)。多因素分析证实先断动脉是导致手术中FR+CTC升高的危险因素(危险率[HR], 4.03 [95%CI, 1.53-10.63];P = .005)。

The propensity-matched analysis included 420 patients (210 with vein-first procedures and 210 with artery-first procedures). The vein-first group had significantly better outcomes than the artery-first group for 5-year overall survival (73.6%[95%CI, 64.4%-82.8%] vs 57.6%[95%CI, 48.4%-66.8%]; P = .002), disease-free survival (63.6%[95%CI, 55.4%-73.8%] vs 48.4%[95%CI, 40.0%-56.8%]; P = .001), and lung cancer–specific survival (76.4%[95%CI, 67.6%-85.2%] vs 59.9%[95%CI, 50.5%-69.3%]; P = .002).

倾向性匹配分析纳入了420例患者(210例采用静脉先断手术,210例采用动脉先断手术)。静脉先断组的5年总生存率 (73.6%[95%CI, 64.4%-82.8%] 相比 57.6%[95%CI, 48.4%-66.8%]);P = .002)、无病生存率(63.6%(95%CI,55.4% - -73.8%)相比48.4%(95%CI,40.0% - -56.8%));肺癌特异性生存率(76.4%[95%CI, 67.6%-85.2%] 相比59.9%[95%CI, 50.5%-69.3%];P = .002)均明显优于动脉先断组。

Multivariate analyses revealed that the artery-first procedure was a prognostic factor of poorer 5-year overall survival (HR, 1.65 [95%CI, 1.07-2.56]; P = .03), disease-free survival (HR, 1.43 [95%CI, 1.01-2.04]; P = .05) and lung cancer–specific survival (HR = 1.65 [95%CI, 1.04-2.61]; P = .03).

多因素分析显示,动脉先断手术是5年总体生存率 (HR, 1.65 [95%CI, 1.07-2.56];P = 03), 无病生存率(HR, 1.43 [95%CI, 1.01-2.04];及肺癌特异性生存率(HR = 1.65 [95%CI, 1.04-2.61];P = 03)较差的预后因素。

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE 结论与意义

Ligating effluent veins first during surgery may reduce tumor cell dissemination and improve survival outcomes in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

术中首先离断流出静脉可减少肿瘤细胞的播散,改善NSCLC患者的生存结局。

作者:SCI天天读



版权声明:
本网站所有注明“来源:梅斯医学”或“来源:MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明“来源:梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,转载内容不代表本站立场。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言
评论区 (7)
#插入话题

相关资讯

JTD:NSCLC患者术后对多西他赛/卡铂辅助治疗耐受良好

对于接受了手术治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者而言,其在术后应用多西他赛/卡铂化疗方案时的安全性和耐受性,目前还不清楚,为了加深对这一问题的了解,来自广州呼吸疾病研究所,广州医科大学第一附属医院的何建行院长及其团队进行了一项研究,研究结果发表于2013年10月出版的《胸部疾病杂志》(J Thorac Dis)上。结果显示:多西他赛和卡铂作为NSCLC术后患者的辅助治疗,具有良好的耐受性。同时,

克唑替尼治疗有脑转移的进展期ROS1阳性NSCLC患者的临床疗效结果公布

WCLC2017,陆舜教授公布了有脑转移的ROS1阳性患者的治疗效果,结果显示有脑转移的ROS1阳性NSCLC患者能从克唑替尼治疗中显着获益。可喜的是,在同一天,CFDA批准了克唑替尼在ROS1阳性的晚期NSCLC中的适应症。

Ann Oncol:克唑替尼治疗过的ALK阳性NSCLC患者:艾乐替尼vs化疗

发表在《Ann Oncol》的一项由意大利、法国、韩国、西班牙等国学者进行的随机、多中心、开放标签的3期试验,比较了艾乐替尼vs化疗在克唑替尼治疗过的间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的作用。

CCLM:NSCLC患者中循环肿瘤细胞预分析条件的标准化

在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)具有非侵入性诊断,预后和预测测试的潜力。将CTC的降解或丢失最小化对于检测和分析低丰度和脆弱的CTC,特别是在临床试验中是至关重要的。我们前瞻性地研究了(NCT02372448)新的血液采集装置与常用的K 3 EDTA管相比,当进行长期样品储存时是否表现更好。 将抽取血样至K 3 EDTA和血液收集管(BCT)(Streck),以及由

晚期NSCLC患者治疗的新选择与新希望

国家食品药品监督管理总局(CFDA)已正式批准盐酸安罗替尼用于晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的三线治疗,掀开了晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗新篇章.特别邀请到江苏省人民医院卢凯华教授与南京鼓楼医院王立峰教授共同探讨安罗替尼上市几个月以来的临床应用情况与未来的应用前景。

奥希替尼为EGFR突变阳性伴脑膜转移NSCLC患者带来显著获益

2019年4月10—13日,2019年欧洲肺癌大会在瑞士日内瓦隆重召开,本次会议聚集了来自全球肺癌领域的知名专家,众多最新临床研究结果在本次会议中公布。中枢神经系统转移是EGFR突变阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌常见的远处转移,与第一代、第二代EGFR-TKI相比,奥希替尼能更好地穿透血脑屏障,既往的研究显示奥希替尼在脑膜转移患者中显示出良好的抗肿瘤活性,为此研究者回顾性地分析了AURA系列研究中合并脑膜转